Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Massachusetts

G.O. Services, LLC

Boston, MA · ~167 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

G.O. Services, LLC runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade C.

G.O. Services, LLC: 3.0 TCR = 102% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

G.O. Services, LLC safety composite

G.O. Services, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

G.O. Services, LLC: 2.7 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.44× in 2022

G.O. Services, LLC's TCR rose 2.1 from 2.7 in 2017 to 4.8 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Boston, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 102% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #61/100
  • PHOTO Stahl Construction C…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~167 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stahl Construction Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

G.O. Services, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows G.O. Services, LLC averages 3.0 TCR (102% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

G.O. Services, LLC TCR series: 2017=2.7 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=4.8 · BLS 2.9

Where G.O. Services, LLC falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 100 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Massachusetts.

G.O. Services, LLC (167 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate G.O. Services, LLC
G.O. Services, LLC (167 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

G.O. Services, LLC has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.8 4.3 9 0 0
2021 2.5 1.6 3 0 0
2020 1.9 0.9 2 0 0
2017 2.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MA · Boston

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 577 employers in Boston, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stahl Construction Company 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Andy Johnson & Co Inc 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Construction 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Effingham 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gilbane Building Company Boston 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nasoya Foods USA, LLC 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kanzaki Specialty Papers 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2 Elizabeth 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Massachusetts General Hospital 26,855 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brigham and Women's Hospital 19,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brigham and Womens Hospital 19,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brigham & Women's Hospital 18,260 FTE
NAT-TCR Badger Tag and Label Corporation 83 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 736 - Harrisonburg 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0233 Tyson - Portland 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR tkSCS Livermore Atlantis 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plymouth Foam 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Versiti Blood Research Institute 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advantech - Milpitas, California 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE 68 - Orland Park 167 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.