Cold forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished · Pennsylvania

Standard Forged Products

Mckees Rocks, PA · ~126 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Standard Forged Products runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cold forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished workplace, earning a grade B.

Standard Forged Products: 2.4 TCR = 73% of Cold forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Standard Forged Products safety composite

Standard Forged Products scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2016→2024

Standard Forged Products injury rate improved

Standard Forged Products's TCR fell 4.9 from 5.7 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.7 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332111 · Mckees Rocks, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #8/35
  • PHOTO Finkl Steel
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~126 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Finkl Steel (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Standard Forged Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Standard Forged Products averages 2.4 TCR (73% of the Cold forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Standard Forged Products TCR series: 2016=5.7 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=2 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Standard Forged Products falls in its industry

241 Cold forgings made from purcha establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 35 Cold forgings made from purcha employers in Pennsylvania.

Standard Forged Products (126 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Standard Forged Products
Standard Forged Products (126 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Standard Forged Products has more employees than the Cold forgings made from purchased iron o median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2023 2.3 0.8 3 0 0
2022 2.5 0.8 3 0 0
2021 2.6 0.9 3 0 0
2020 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.0 1.3 3 0 0
2018 3.1 1.9 5 0 0
2017 1.8 1.8 3 0 0
2016 5.7 4.0 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332111 · PA · Mckees Rocks

241 Cold forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 37 employers in Mckees Rocks, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Finkl Steel 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. - Wooster Manufacturing Facility 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Worthington Steel Taylor 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forged Metals Inc 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Modern Mushroom Farms, Inc. 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Reading 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forcine Concrete & Construction Co. Inc. 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE BQ Philadelphia 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ohio Valley Hospital 616 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heritage Valley Health System - Kennedy Campus 496 FTE
CITY-NEAR Citizen Care 443 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milestone Centers 294 FTE
NAT-TCR PABCO Paper - Vernon 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR PlyGem Window Peachtree City 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bay State Milling Platteville 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Greens at Hendersonville LLC 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Emporia Distribution Center 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eagle Mountain Case Rdy DC 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lendlease Communities 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Becton Dickinson 126 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.