Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · Georgia

PlyGem Window Peachtree City

Peachtree City, GA · ~298 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PlyGem Window Peachtree City runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

PlyGem Window Peachtree City: 2.4 TCR = 73% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PlyGem Window Peachtree City safety composite

PlyGem Window Peachtree City scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2022→2024

PlyGem Window Peachtree City injury rate improved

PlyGem Window Peachtree City's TCR fell 1.1 from 3.3 in 2022 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.3 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Peachtree City, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #41/103
  • PHOTO Fibertech Plastics …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~298 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fibertech Plastics LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

PlyGem Window Peachtree City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PlyGem Window Peachtree City averages 2.4 TCR (73% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PlyGem Window Peachtree City TCR series: 2022=3.3 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where PlyGem Window Peachtree City falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 103 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in Georgia.

PlyGem Window Peachtree City (298 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate PlyGem Window Peachtree City
PlyGem Window Peachtree City (298 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

PlyGem Window Peachtree City has more employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 0.7 6 0 0
2023 1.8 1.1 5 0 0
2022 3.3 3.0 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · GA · Peachtree City

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 83 employers in Peachtree City, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fibertech Plastics LLC 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emhart Teknologies 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Automotive Building 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CertainTeed Claremont16 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 8945-Georgia Power 298 FTE
STATE-SIZE Syntec Yarn 298 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1076 298 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1184 298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Peachtree City (PTCGA) 4,488 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. 3,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osmose Utilities Service, Inc. 3,072 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper Lighting Peachtree City 843 FTE
NAT-TCR PABCO Paper - Vernon 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bay State Milling Platteville 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Standard Forged Products 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Seward Highway - Mass Excavation 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE New York Manhattan 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thermotron 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA_Chatsworth_9260 Topanga Canyon BL_0CVI8E60 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rieth-Riley - Indianapolis 298 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.