General warehousing and storage · Ohio

Stanley Black & Decker Columbus DC

Columbus, OH · ~118 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stanley Black & Decker Columbus DC runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Stanley Black & Decker Columbus DC: 1.8 TCR = 32% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stanley Black & Decker Columbus DC safety composite

Stanley Black & Decker Columbus DC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2016→2024

Stanley Black & Decker Columbus DC injury rate improved

Stanley Black & Decker Columbus DC's TCR fell 4.8 from 6.4 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2017=2.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Columbus, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 32% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #165/556
  • PHOTO DC1 & DC2
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DC1 & DC2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Stanley Black & Decker Columbus DC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stanley Black & Decker Columbus DC averages 1.8 TCR (32% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stanley Black & Decker Columbus DC TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=2.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 5.8

Where Stanley Black & Decker Columbus DC falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #165 safest of 556 General warehousing and storag employers in Ohio.

Stanley Black & Decker Columbus DC (118 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Stanley Black & Decker Columbus DC
Stanley Black & Decker Columbus DC (118 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Stanley Black & Decker Columbus DC has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2023 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2022 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.4 0.8 3 0 0
2016 6.4 5.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · OH · Columbus

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DC1 & DC2 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryder Milton 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Expeditors - SAV 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Branch 3468 - Farmers Branch 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contracting Solutions, LLC 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCI Services, Inc. 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Velvet Ice Cream Co - Utica 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE SFO Ice Cream 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR University of Minnesota Duluth 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cadillac Renewable Energy 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #1 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Reliable Products, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Schwing Bioset 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE APEX - Philadelphia 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amigo Management Company 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Teddan Produce 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.