Springs, precision (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip · Illinois

Stanley Spring & Stamping

Chicago, IL · ~68 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stanley Spring & Stamping runs at 209% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Springs, precision (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip workplace, earning a grade F.

Stanley Spring & Stamping: 6.9 TCR = 209% of Springs, precision (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stanley Spring & Stamping safety composite

Stanley Spring & Stamping scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−31.2

2016→2024

Stanley Spring & Stamping injury rate improved

Stanley Spring & Stamping's TCR fell 31.2 from 33.0 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 33.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=33.0 · 2018=6.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332613 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 209% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #14/17
  • PHOTO Pototoc Spring
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pototoc Spring (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Stanley Spring & Stamping in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stanley Spring & Stamping averages 6.9 TCR (209% of the Springs, precision (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stanley Spring & Stamping TCR series: 2016=33 · 2018=6.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=3 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Stanley Spring & Stamping falls in its industry

189 Springs, precision (except clo establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 17 Springs, precision (except clo employers in Illinois.

Stanley Spring & Stamping (68 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Stanley Spring & Stamping
Stanley Spring & Stamping (68 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Stanley Spring & Stamping has more employees than the Springs, precision (except clock, watch) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2023 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.4 0.0 2 0 0
2021 3.0 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.6 6.6 4 0 0
2016 33.0 11.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332613 · IL · Chicago

189 Springs, precision (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pototoc Spring 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scandic Springs, Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greer Springs 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pa-Ted Spring Company LLC 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fernlea Nurseries -MAG 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva STJ1 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2057-Centralia, IL 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE NG Rockford Service Center 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Custom Nonwoven, INC. 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trobella Cabinetry 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Belton 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Danisi Fuel Co Inc 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Estates at Bloomington 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yosemite Fall Labor Inc 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Altamaha Electric Membership Corp 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE 147 Camelback 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.