Nursing homes · Kentucky

Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Stanton, KY · ~69 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center runs at 214% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade F.

Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 13.9 TCR = 214% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.3

2016→2021

Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 11.3 from 26.1 in 2016 to 14.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 26.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=26.1 · 2017=10.0 · 2019=13.3 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=14.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Stanton, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.9 · 214% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #288/340
  • PHOTO Muskingum Skilled Nu…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Muskingum Skilled Nursing & Rehab (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center averages 13.9 TCR (214% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=26.1 · 2017=10 · 2019=13.3 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=14.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #288 safest of 340 Nursing homes employers in Kentucky.

Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (69 employees, TCR 13.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (69 employees, TCR 13.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 14.9 5.6 4 4 0
2020 5.1 5.1 3 0 0
2019 13.3 8.3 8 0 0
2017 10.0 10.0 6 0 0
2016 26.1 20.9 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · KY · Stanton

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 14 employers in Stanton, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Muskingum Skilled Nursing & Rehab 13.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9288-B32 13.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Embassy Rehab & Care Center 13.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walla Walla Veterans Home 13.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spy Coast Farm, LLC 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Warren County Water District 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Verst 300/Corporate 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heaven Hill Bernheim Distillery 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR 024-00411 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR KYSTA - STANTON CENTER 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stanton Nursing & Rehab Center 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR STANTON CENTER (KYSTA) 58 FTE
NAT-TCR Derby Industries, LLC Galesburg 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Clarence Strickler Road 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1334 - Bayonne Nj Whse 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-837-Williams Sonoma 13.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Party Reflections Charlotte 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE All American Lumber-Tomah 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire Department 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.