Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Indiana

Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso

Vaalparaiso, IN · ~69 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso runs at 364% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso: 13.8 TCR = 364% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso safety composite

Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2021

Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso injury rate improved

Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso's TCR fell 2.8 from 11.8 in 2016 to 9.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 24.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.8 · 2017=9.6 · 2018=24.9 · 2021=9.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Vaalparaiso, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.8 · 364% of ind

  • DART 6.8 DART
  • RANK #122/133
  • PHOTO Myrtle Beach Manor
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Myrtle Beach Manor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso averages 13.8 TCR (364% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso TCR series: 2016=11.8 · 2017=9.6 · 2018=24.9 · 2021=9.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #122 safest of 133 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Indiana.

Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso (69 employees, TCR 13.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso
Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso (69 employees, TCR 13.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.1 6.8 2 2 0
2018 24.9 15.3 12 1 0
2017 9.6 9.6 5 0 0
2016 11.8 2.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IN · Vaalparaiso

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Myrtle Beach Manor 13.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benedictine Living Community | Anoka 13.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village Gate of Farmington 13.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peregrine Senior Living at Crimson Ridge Gardens 13.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vectren Corporation - Vectren Technology Acceleration Center 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kennedy Tank & Manufacturing Co., Inc. Field Division 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coil Processors LLC 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry C. Smither Roofing Co., Inc. 69 FTE
NAT-TCR Murray Hill Tower 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Steel Huggers LLC 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hydraulic Tubes & Fittings, LL 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR White Block Company, Inc. 13.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Party Reflections Charlotte 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire Department 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE JBDA Mangham Office 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.