Signals (e.g., highway, pedestrian, railway, traffic) manufacturing · Texas

Statewide Traffic Signal Company

Houston, TX · ~23 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Statewide Traffic Signal Company runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Signals (e.g., highway, pedestrian, railway, traffic) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Statewide Traffic Signal Company: 3.2 TCR = 97% of Signals (e.g., highway, pedestrian, railway, traffic) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Statewide Traffic Signal Company safety composite

Statewide Traffic Signal Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.7

2020→2024

Statewide Traffic Signal Company injury rate improved

Statewide Traffic Signal Company's TCR fell 7.7 from 7.7 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=7.7 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334290 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 97% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO FAAC International R…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FAAC International Rockledge (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Statewide Traffic Signal Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Statewide Traffic Signal Company averages 3.2 TCR (97% of the Signals (e.g., highway, pedestrian, railway, traffic) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Statewide Traffic Signal Company TCR series: 2020=7.7 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Statewide Traffic Signal Company falls in its industry

103 Signals (e.g., highway, pedest establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Signals (e.g., highway, pedest employers in Texas.

Statewide Traffic Signal Company (23 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 127 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Statewide Traffic Signal Company
Statewide Traffic Signal Company (23 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 127 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Statewide Traffic Signal Company has fewer employees than the Signals (e.g., highway, pedestrian, rail median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 8.3 8.3 2 0 0
2020 7.7 3.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334290 · TX · Houston

103 Signals (e.g., highway, pedestrian, railway, traffic) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FAAC International Rockledge 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hitachi Rail STS Batesburg, SC 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR WANCO, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Econolite Group, Inc. 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Houston South Mill Distribution, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smallhold, Buda 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMARILLO SOD FARM 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE VISITORS MANAGEMENT 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 0023 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0033 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0055 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0123 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Moneysworth & Best USA 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE BMD Dunn 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of Zionsville Parks and Recreation 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sacramento Ear Nose and Throat - Roseville 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.