Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing · Georgia

Sterling Engineering & Fabrication, Inc

Carrollton, GA · ~23 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sterling Engineering & Fabrication, Inc runs at 219% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Sterling Engineering & Fabrication, Inc: 7.2 TCR = 219% of Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sterling Engineering & Fabrication, Inc safety composite

Sterling Engineering & Fabrication, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.2

2017→2024

Sterling Engineering & Fabrication, Inc injury rate improved

Sterling Engineering & Fabrication, Inc's TCR fell 7.2 from 12.0 in 2017 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.0 · 2020=5.0 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Carrollton, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.2 · 219% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #39/51
  • PHOTO Anderson Building Ma…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Anderson Building Materials, Co (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Sterling Engineering & Fabrication, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sterling Engineering & Fabrication, Inc averages 7.2 TCR (219% of the Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sterling Engineering & Fabrication, Inc TCR series: 2017=12 · 2020=5 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Sterling Engineering & Fabrication, Inc falls in its industry

1,491 Structural steel, fabricated, establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 51 Structural steel, fabricated, employers in Georgia.

Sterling Engineering & Fabrication, Inc (23 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sterling Engineering & Fabrication, Inc
Sterling Engineering & Fabrication, Inc (23 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Sterling Engineering & Fabrication, Inc has fewer employees than the Structural steel, fabricated, manufactur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2017 12.0 4.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · GA · Carrollton

1,491 Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 93 employers in Carrollton, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Anderson Building Materials, Co 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Steel Mfg. Corp. 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pegasus Steel LLC. 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR INDUSTRIAL FABRICATORS, INCORPRATED 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Canon Pullet 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clermont Hatchery 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hatchery 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROSSMAN APIARIES LLC 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tanner Medical Center/Carrollton 2,124 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tanner Medical Center / Carrollton 1,691 FTE
CITY-NEAR Decostar 912 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate 847 FTE
NAT-TCR Demountable Concepts, Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Shoreline Metal Fabricators, Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Team Farrell 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Southview Senior Living 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE TransMontaigne Collins Piedmont Terminal 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE PJ Currier Lumber 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allemand Industries, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cheshire Store 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.