Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings · Indiana

Sterling Management Ltd., Inc.

Mishawaka, IN · ~87 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sterling Management Ltd., Inc. runs at 539% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings workplace, earning a grade F.

Sterling Management Ltd., Inc.: 7.5 TCR = 539% of Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings BLS 1.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sterling Management Ltd., Inc. safety composite

Sterling Management Ltd., Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2019→2024

Sterling Management Ltd., Inc. injury rate improved

Sterling Management Ltd., Inc.'s TCR fell 3.0 from 3.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 34.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=34.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531110 · Mishawaka, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.5 · 539% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/27
  • PHOTO Schwartz Family Prop…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Schwartz Family Properties 2, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Sterling Management Ltd., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sterling Management Ltd., Inc. averages 7.5 TCR (539% of the Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sterling Management Ltd., Inc. TCR series: 2019=3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=34.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Sterling Management Ltd., Inc. falls in its industry

1,100 Lessors of residential buildin establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 27 Lessors of residential buildin employers in Indiana.

Sterling Management Ltd., Inc. (87 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sterling Management Ltd., Inc.
Sterling Management Ltd., Inc. (87 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Sterling Management Ltd., Inc. has more employees than the Lessors of residential buildings and dwe median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 34.7 34.7 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531110 · IN · Mishawaka

1,100 Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 185 employers in Mishawaka, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Schwartz Family Properties 2, LLC 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR J.K. Residential Services, Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale North Boulder 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR WATER OAK GOLF 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors, Loda 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vectren Corporation - AB Brown 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE ATLS B1LG 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE A&D Constructors, LLC 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center Mishawaka 1,906 FTE
CITY-NEAR AM General, LLC 459 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCI - 039 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2678 381 FTE
NAT-TCR ML Products 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR DHCS Associates, LLC d/b/a DoubleTree Colorado Springs 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunrise Carpentry Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 0825 - Peoria North 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corteva New Madrid Production 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paumac Tubing LLC - Michigan 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairview 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0005 La Habra 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.