Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building · Texas

Sterling Structures, Inc.

Houston, TX · ~32 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sterling Structures, Inc. runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade C.

Sterling Structures, Inc.: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sterling Structures, Inc. safety composite

Sterling Structures, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sterling Structures, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Sterling Structures, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/327
  • PHOTO Tripp Enterprises Inc
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tripp Enterprises Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Sterling Structures, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sterling Structures, Inc. averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Sterling Structures, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Sterling Structures, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 327 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Texas.

Sterling Structures, Inc. (32 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Sterling Structures, Inc.
Sterling Structures, Inc. (32 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Sterling Structures, Inc. has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation, com median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · TX · Houston

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tripp Enterprises Inc 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Madison Construction 2016 OSHA 300 & 300A 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tepcon Construction Inc 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilbane Building Company Houston 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4795-EA-ABI-ABILENE-ABI-TRML 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Compass Steel Erection, Inc. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Texas GI Center 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE TXD032 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE SpecSys Inc Montevideo 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutter Medical Foundation (185-249) 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutter Senior Care (110-8101) 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Staples Arden Hills SDO 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.