General Medical and Surgical Hospitals · California

Sutter Senior Care (110-8101)

Sacramento, CA · ~32 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
12.6
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sutter Senior Care (110-8101) runs at 168% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General Medical and Surgical Hospitals workplace, earning a grade D.

Sutter Senior Care (110-8101): 12.6 TCR = 168% of General Medical and Surgical Hospitals BLS 7.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sutter Senior Care (110-8101) safety composite

Sutter Senior Care (110-8101) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sutter Senior Care (110-8101): 8.2 → 99.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 297.8 TCR · DART/TCR 7.9× in 2021

Sutter Senior Care (110-8101)'s TCR rose 91.4 from 8.2 in 2017 to 99.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 297.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 7.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 12.6 · 168% of ind

  • DART 99.6 DART
  • RANK #625/662
  • PHOTO UNC Health Care
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UNC Health Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sutter Senior Care (110-8101) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sutter Senior Care (110-8101) averages 12.6 TCR (168% of the General Medical and Surgical Hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sutter Senior Care (110-8101) TCR series: 2017=8.2 · 2018=297.8 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=24.2 · 2021=99.6 · BLS 7.5

Where Sutter Senior Care (110-8101) falls in its industry

6,862 General Medical and Surgical H establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #625 safest of 662 General Medical and Surgical H employers in California.

Sutter Senior Care (110-8101) (32 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sutter Senior Care (110-8101)
Sutter Senior Care (110-8101) (32 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Sutter Senior Care (110-8101) has fewer employees than the General Medical and Surgical Hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 99.6 99.6 1 0 0
2020 24.2 20.2 5 1 0
2019 5.4 5.4 1 0 0
2018 297.8 274.9 13 0 0
2017 8.2 6.6 2 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · CA · Sacramento

6,862 General Medical and Surgical Hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UNC Health Care 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glencoe Regional Health 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR UW Medical Center Montlake 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sierra Nevada Memorial Miners-Hospital 12.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schreiner Farms 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIVE POINTS T.I.C. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE OFFICE 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brocchini Farms Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Challenger Pallet & Supply - Utah 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Firesteel Healthcare 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 568830-Mil-West Milwaukee Br 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Axiom Family of Companies 12.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Motion Sensors, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE SpecSys Inc Montevideo 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roy H. Turnbull, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE SMI 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.