General warehousing and storage · North Carolina

Stewart Moving and Storage of Fayetteville

Fayetteville, NC · ~22 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stewart Moving and Storage of Fayetteville runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Stewart Moving and Storage of Fayetteville: 1.8 TCR = 32% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stewart Moving and Storage of Fayetteville safety composite

Stewart Moving and Storage of Fayetteville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2019→2024

Stewart Moving and Storage of Fayetteville injury rate improved

Stewart Moving and Storage of Fayetteville's TCR fell 3.7 from 3.7 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Fayetteville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #92/330
  • PHOTO ODW Logistics - DC11
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ODW Logistics - DC11 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Stewart Moving and Storage of Fayetteville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stewart Moving and Storage of Fayetteville averages 1.8 TCR (32% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stewart Moving and Storage of Fayetteville TCR series: 2019=3.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Stewart Moving and Storage of Fayetteville falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #92 safest of 330 General warehousing and storag employers in North Carolina.

Stewart Moving and Storage of Fayetteville (22 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Stewart Moving and Storage of Fayetteville
Stewart Moving and Storage of Fayetteville (22 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Stewart Moving and Storage of Fayetteville has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.7 3.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NC · Fayetteville

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 317 employers in Fayetteville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ODW Logistics - DC11 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ecolab DC Warehouse 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MICHAELS DISTRIBUTION CENTER #1 - ALLIANCE 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunbelt Outdoor Products 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE A Plus Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rock Ridge Farms Partnership 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vanguard Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE LNM - 105 -EST 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cape Fear Valley Health System/Cumberland County 5,925 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company - Fayetteville 2,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Cumberland 2,104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Fayetteville 2,044 FTE
NAT-TCR AFL Enterprise Services Inc- Optical Telecom Division Addison 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Rapids Branch 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ecolab DC Warehouse 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR First Article Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Granulation Technology, Inc 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE S09062 - Marana Regional Landfill 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE S09652 - Kern County Rosamond Operations 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03759 - WM of NM - Rio Rancho Landfill 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.