Medical service plans without providing health care services · California

Stock Ranch Road Retirement Community

Citrus Heights, CA · ~58 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stock Ranch Road Retirement Community runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Medical service plans without providing health care services workplace, earning a grade C.

Stock Ranch Road Retirement Community: 3.8 TCR = 101% of Medical service plans without providing health care services BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stock Ranch Road Retirement Community safety composite

Stock Ranch Road Retirement Community scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2019→2021

Stock Ranch Road Retirement Community injury rate improved

Stock Ranch Road Retirement Community's TCR fell 2.7 from 5.2 in 2019 to 2.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.2 · 2021=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Citrus Heights, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 101% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #70/635
  • PHOTO bowman estates
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: bowman estates (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Stock Ranch Road Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stock Ranch Road Retirement Community averages 3.8 TCR (101% of the Medical service plans without providing health care services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Stock Ranch Road Retirement Community TCR series: 2019=5.2 · 2021=2.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Stock Ranch Road Retirement Community falls in its industry

6,510 Medical service plans without establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #70 safest of 635 Medical service plans without employers in California.

Stock Ranch Road Retirement Community (58 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Stock Ranch Road Retirement Community
Stock Ranch Road Retirement Community (58 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Stock Ranch Road Retirement Community has more employees than the Medical service plans without providing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.5 2.5 0 1 0
2019 5.2 5.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Citrus Heights

6,510 Medical service plans without providing health care services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 65 employers in Citrus Heights, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR bowman estates 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villas of Holly Brook - Collinsville 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnolia Springs East 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ohio Living - Lake Vista 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grocery Outlet Santa Cruz 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Villa De Anza Holdings, LLC 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Signal Hill 8 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE JSB Logistics Corporation 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR On My Own Independent Living Services - Citrus Heights 433 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3712 347 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3712 330 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0771 - CITRUS HEIGHTS CA WHSE 278 FTE
NAT-TCR LAW- Lawrence 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Calumet Park 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lynchburg 4974 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR WG 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Distribution South Campus 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madison, WI HVAC 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Region 2 -Corvallis 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sl Start & Associates, LLC - Coeur D'Alene Id 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.