Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors · Minnesota

Stockness Construction Inc

Hugo, MN · ~93 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stockness Construction Inc runs at 250% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Stockness Construction Inc: 7.0 TCR = 250% of Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stockness Construction Inc safety composite

Stockness Construction Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Stockness Construction Inc: 3.8 → 7.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 9.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.05× in 2024

Stockness Construction Inc's TCR rose 3.6 from 3.8 in 2018 to 7.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Hugo, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 250% of ind

  • DART 7.4 DART
  • RANK #14/27
  • PHOTO Liberty Concrete and…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Liberty Concrete and Forming Construction, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Stockness Construction Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stockness Construction Inc averages 7.0 TCR (250% of the Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stockness Construction Inc TCR series: 2018=3.8 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=9.5 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=6.6 · 2024=7.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Stockness Construction Inc falls in its industry

1,314 Foundation, building, poured c establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 27 Foundation, building, poured c employers in Minnesota.

Stockness Construction Inc (93 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Stockness Construction Inc
Stockness Construction Inc (93 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Stockness Construction Inc has more employees than the Foundation, building, poured concrete, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.4 7.4 7 0 0
2023 6.6 6.6 6 0 0
2022 8.3 8.3 7 0 0
2021 9.5 7.2 8 0 0
2020 8.6 4.9 7 0 0
2019 4.9 3.7 4 0 0
2018 3.8 3.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · MN · Hugo

1,314 Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 20 employers in Hugo, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Liberty Concrete and Forming Construction, LLC 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4495 Hacienda 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lenard Powell, Inc 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rock Foundations 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Better Futures Minnesota 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bruce Kreofsky and Sons 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bruce Kreofsky & Sons, Inc 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Legend Mechanical, LLC 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lametti and Sons Inc. 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schwieters Co. Inc. 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Festival Foods Hugo 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oneka 68 FTE
NAT-TCR Williamsburg Store 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ground Effects, LLC - 16-Mile Sterling Heights 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rosauers #9 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Homestead Baking Company Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ortec - Piedmont 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Agrana Fruit US, Inc. Lysander 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE MAC Trailer Texas, Inc. 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE MAC Trailer of Oklahoma, Inc. 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.