Carbon organic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing · South Carolina

Ortec - Piedmont

Piedmont, SC · ~93 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ortec - Piedmont runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Carbon organic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Ortec - Piedmont: 0.7 TCR = 21% of Carbon organic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ortec - Piedmont safety composite

Ortec - Piedmont scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2018→2024

Ortec - Piedmont injury rate improved

Ortec - Piedmont's TCR fell 1.5 from 1.5 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.5 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325199 · Piedmont, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/21
  • PHOTO Lanxess Corporation
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lanxess Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Ortec - Piedmont in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ortec - Piedmont averages 0.7 TCR (21% of the Carbon organic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ortec - Piedmont TCR series: 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Ortec - Piedmont falls in its industry

552 Carbon organic compounds, not establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 21 Carbon organic compounds, not employers in South Carolina.

Ortec - Piedmont (93 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Ortec - Piedmont
Ortec - Piedmont (93 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Ortec - Piedmont has more employees than the Carbon organic compounds, not specified median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325199 · SC · Piedmont

552 Carbon organic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 71 employers in Piedmont, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lanxess Corporation 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elementis Specialties Proctor WV 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Covestro South Charleston 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AltAir Paramount LLC 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE US Coatings LLC - South Carolina 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Carolina Truss 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOCOM Duncan 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central States Manufacturing - Graniteville 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drive Automotive Industries of America 1,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Blood Connection 657 FTE
CITY-NEAR PL Developments - OGR Plant 591 FTE
CITY-NEAR C453 Greenville 372 FTE
NAT-TCR MSA Safety Pittsburgh Manufacturing, LLC - Murrysville 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Corrigan Moving and Storage Co 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Talley Sign Company 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 9150 E. Imperial Hwy. 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stockness Construction Inc 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE MAC Trailer Texas, Inc. 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE MAC Trailer of Oklahoma, Inc. 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bullitt County Ems 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.