Can forming machines, metalworking, manufacturing · Colorado

Stolle Machinery - Englewood

Englewood, CO · ~62 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stolle Machinery - Englewood runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Can forming machines, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Stolle Machinery - Englewood: 2.6 TCR = 80% of Can forming machines, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stolle Machinery - Englewood safety composite

Stolle Machinery - Englewood scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2024

Stolle Machinery - Englewood injury rate improved

Stolle Machinery - Englewood's TCR fell 1.1 from 3.7 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.7 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Englewood, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 80% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO NSH USA Corporation
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NSH USA Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Stolle Machinery - Englewood in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stolle Machinery - Englewood averages 2.6 TCR (80% of the Can forming machines, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stolle Machinery - Englewood TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Stolle Machinery - Englewood falls in its industry

391 Can forming machines, metalwor establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Can forming machines, metalwor employers in Colorado.

Stolle Machinery - Englewood (62 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Stolle Machinery - Englewood
Stolle Machinery - Englewood (62 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Stolle Machinery - Englewood has more employees than the Can forming machines, metalworking, manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2023 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2021 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.7 2.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · CO · Englewood

391 Can forming machines, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 325 employers in Englewood, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NSH USA Corporation 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR EMAG LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delaware Dynamics, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bystronic Inc 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lennar Multi-Family - Mountain State (CO) 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCU 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE W. E. O'Neil Construction Company of Colorado 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Headquarters 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR WAH - East and West 2,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Meridian 2,030 FTE
CITY-NEAR Swedish Medical Center 1,516 FTE
CITY-NEAR ULA-Denver 1,324 FTE
NAT-TCR UST 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Costello Dismantling Company, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hausmann Construction Inc 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sandra's Marking Company, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Talk O' Texas Brands Inc 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant 4 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Middleborough Gas & Electric Department Gas Division 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Middleborough Gas & Electric Department Electric Division 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.