Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities · Indiana

Stone Belt Arc, Inc. - LARC

Bedford, IN · ~33 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stone Belt Arc, Inc. - LARC runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Stone Belt Arc, Inc. - LARC: 6.3 TCR = 165% of Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stone Belt Arc, Inc. - LARC safety composite

Stone Belt Arc, Inc. - LARC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.1

2017→2024

Stone Belt Arc, Inc. - LARC injury rate improved

Stone Belt Arc, Inc. - LARC's TCR fell 15.1 from 19.9 in 2017 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 19.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=19.9 · 2018=8.3 · 2020=6.0 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Bedford, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 165% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/52
  • PHOTO Park View Homes
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Park View Homes (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Stone Belt Arc, Inc. - LARC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stone Belt Arc, Inc. - LARC averages 6.3 TCR (165% of the Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stone Belt Arc, Inc. - LARC TCR series: 2017=19.9 · 2018=8.3 · 2020=6 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Stone Belt Arc, Inc. - LARC falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 52 Intellectual and developmental employers in Indiana.

Stone Belt Arc, Inc. - LARC (33 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Stone Belt Arc, Inc. - LARC
Stone Belt Arc, Inc. - LARC (33 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Stone Belt Arc, Inc. - LARC has fewer employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.1 5.1 1 0 0
2020 6.0 0.0 0 1 0
2018 8.3 8.3 2 0 0
2017 19.9 7.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · IN · Bedford

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 53 employers in Bedford, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Park View Homes 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cimarron 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brian's House Inc 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Administrative Office 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE IN-NPDI-INDIANA 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newberry Farms, LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Belvarken A.I. Center 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE AES 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Bedford 818 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1026 394 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1026 363 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bedford Hospital 361 FTE
NAT-TCR Prime Hospitality Group 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Independent Can Company-Conneaut 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sarah A Reed Retirement Center 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR College Park Elementary School 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maxim Roofing Company, LLC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE NWC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walkup Company 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charlotte South 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.