Irrigation project construction (except lawn) · California

Streamline Irrigation

Kingsburg, CA · ~56 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Streamline Irrigation runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Irrigation project construction (except lawn) workplace, earning a grade A.

Streamline Irrigation: 1.3 TCR = 48% of Irrigation project construction (except lawn) BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Streamline Irrigation safety composite

Streamline Irrigation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.7

2017→2024

Streamline Irrigation injury rate improved

Streamline Irrigation's TCR fell 7.7 from 7.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.7 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Kingsburg, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #37/201
  • PHOTO Amerine Systems, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amerine Systems, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Streamline Irrigation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Streamline Irrigation averages 1.3 TCR (48% of the Irrigation project construction (except lawn) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Streamline Irrigation TCR series: 2017=7.7 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Streamline Irrigation falls in its industry

1,614 Irrigation project constructio establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 201 Irrigation project constructio employers in California.

Streamline Irrigation (56 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Streamline Irrigation
Streamline Irrigation (56 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Streamline Irrigation has more employees than the Irrigation project construction (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 3 0 0
2023 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.1 0.0 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.1 0.0 4 0 0
2019 0.1 0.0 3 0 0
2017 7.7 7.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · CA · Kingsburg

1,614 Irrigation project construction (except lawn) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 62 employers in Kingsburg, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amerine Systems, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR B & C CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR D & D DRILLING, INC. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR M. B. Kahn Water Works Div. Lake Moultrie WTP 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wallace Brothers 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Sun Farms, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1624 Poole Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Copperhill 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR LEOPOLDO'S FARM SERVICE, INC. 2,541 FTE
CITY-NEAR OFR INC 1,020 FTE
CITY-NEAR EDITH VILLALBASO 747 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kingsburg Fruit Packing Inc. 524 FTE
NAT-TCR Hills- Grand Prairie, TX 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Harlingen 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR J&D Refrigerated 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lewis Environmental, LLC Corporate 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fredonia Operating Hqtrs-Ny40 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sumner, WA - 2720 E Valley Hwy 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plaza Las Americas 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Anselm College** 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.