Footing and foundation concrete contractors · New York

Structural Services of New York

Rochester, NY · ~112 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Structural Services of New York runs at 155% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Footing and foundation concrete contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Structural Services of New York: 4.3 TCR = 155% of Footing and foundation concrete contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Structural Services of New York safety composite

Structural Services of New York scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Structural Services of New York injury rate improved

Structural Services of New York's TCR fell 1.2 from 6.1 in 2016 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.1 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=4.8 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Rochester, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 155% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #18/35
  • PHOTO MAIN OFFICES/SHOP
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MAIN OFFICES/SHOP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Structural Services of New York in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Structural Services of New York averages 4.3 TCR (155% of the Footing and foundation concrete contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Structural Services of New York TCR series: 2016=6.1 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=4.8 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=5 · BLS 2.8

Where Structural Services of New York falls in its industry

1,314 Footing and foundation concret establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 35 Footing and foundation concret employers in New York.

Structural Services of New York (112 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Structural Services of New York
Structural Services of New York (112 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Structural Services of New York has more employees than the Footing and foundation concrete contract median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 3.3 6 0 0
2023 2.4 2.4 3 0 0
2022 2.7 1.8 3 0 0
2021 4.3 3.2 4 0 0
2020 3.3 2.2 3 0 0
2018 4.8 4.8 5 0 0
2017 6.2 5.5 8 0 0
2016 6.1 3.4 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · NY · Rochester

1,314 Footing and foundation concrete contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MAIN OFFICES/SHOP 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bakers Pittsburgh 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Concrete Construction 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dakota RM Construction Inc 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beak & Skiff Apple Farms, Inc. 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mamais Contracting Corp 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7207_16529 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glo Electric LLC 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR Ameriflight, LLC- Portland 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1435 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1402 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1358 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nehemiah Rebar Services, Inc. 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Albuquerque-Specialty Hospital LLC 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnson Bros. Corporation, a Southland Company - 1028 ARDOT I-30 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodhaven Retirement Community 112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.