Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing · North Carolina

Structured Steel Products Corporation

Clayton, NC · ~79 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Structured Steel Products Corporation runs at 362% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Structured Steel Products Corporation: 11.9 TCR = 362% of Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Structured Steel Products Corporation safety composite

Structured Steel Products Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Structured Steel Products Corporation: 7.7 → 14.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 14.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.71× in 2024

Structured Steel Products Corporation's TCR rose 6.5 from 7.7 in 2022 to 14.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Clayton, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.9 · 362% of ind

  • DART 8.5 DART
  • RANK #41/41
  • PHOTO LCI - 084
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LCI - 084 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Structured Steel Products Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Structured Steel Products Corporation averages 11.9 TCR (362% of the Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Structured Steel Products Corporation TCR series: 2022=7.7 · 2023=14 · 2024=14.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Structured Steel Products Corporation falls in its industry

1,491 Structural steel, fabricated, establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 41 Structural steel, fabricated, employers in North Carolina.

Structured Steel Products Corporation (79 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Structured Steel Products Corporation
Structured Steel Products Corporation (79 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Structured Steel Products Corporation has more employees than the Structural steel, fabricated, manufactur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.2 8.5 6 4 0
2023 14.0 9.3 8 1 0
2022 7.7 3.1 2 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · NC · Clayton

1,491 Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 77 employers in Clayton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LCI - 084 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trinity Construction Products, Inc. 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR A & S Fabricating Co. 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Haberle Steel, Inc 11.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience Laurinburg 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE GASTONIA OPS MOC GARAGE BLDG B 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sikes Place - Ste 100 / 200 / 250 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inside Sales Raleigh 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR GRIFOLS THERAPEUTICS LLC (CLAYTON) 1,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR DFP Clayton 808 FTE
CITY-NEAR LSAM DAPI-US 664 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Industries, LP 644 FTE
NAT-TCR Angell - West 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Everett Ship Repair 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR BelGioioso Cheese - Langes Corners 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 3225 - Long Beach Bixby 11.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kraiburg Tpe Corp 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ivy Park at Roseville 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE TFC Poultry LLC 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oak-Technical Operations 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.