Sterilizers, hospital and surgical, manufacturing · Arizona

Stryker Sustainability Solutions

Phoenix, AZ · ~547 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stryker Sustainability Solutions runs at 302% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sterilizers, hospital and surgical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Stryker Sustainability Solutions: 10.0 TCR = 302% of Sterilizers, hospital and surgical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stryker Sustainability Solutions safety composite

Stryker Sustainability Solutions scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−108.4

2016→2021

Stryker Sustainability Solutions injury rate improved

Stryker Sustainability Solutions's TCR fell 108.4 from 109.3 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 109.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=109.3 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=33.1 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339113 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 302% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #19/21
  • PHOTO Showa Best Glove, In…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 93 inj
  • SIZE ~547 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Showa Best Glove, Inc. Fayette Division (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Stryker Sustainability Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stryker Sustainability Solutions averages 10.0 TCR (302% of the Sterilizers, hospital and surgical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stryker Sustainability Solutions TCR series: 2016=109.3 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=33.1 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Stryker Sustainability Solutions falls in its industry

555 Sterilizers, hospital and surg establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 21 Sterilizers, hospital and surg employers in Arizona.

Stryker Sustainability Solutions (547 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Stryker Sustainability Solutions
Stryker Sustainability Solutions (547 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Stryker Sustainability Solutions has more employees than the Sterilizers, hospital and surgical, manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.0 0.3 6 0 0
2020 4.8 0.9 11 0 0
2019 5.5 2.4 14 0 0
2018 33.1 2.1 16 0 0
2017 5.5 0.8 19 1 0
2016 109.3 40.5 27 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339113 · AZ · Phoenix

555 Sterilizers, hospital and surgical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Showa Best Glove, Inc. Fayette Division 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Warwick, RI 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Copan Diagnostics 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CSC 3010 10.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMZL : DPX6 546 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHX-PHOENIX-RESERVATIONS 549 FTE
STATE-SIZE 185-DC185 550 FTE
STATE-SIZE Funko Buckeye 550 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR AmeriGas - Garner, NC 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Flame Gas - Mt Pleasant, SC 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Public Services (past E&I) 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Frankfort Sybaris 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jacksonville Combination Center 547 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seniorlink Inc 547 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Anthony's Health Center 547 FTE
NAT-SIZE 9277-640 Hunter Mountain 547 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.