Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) · Massachusetts

Stumpy s Tree Service

Ashland, MA · ~31 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stumpy s Tree Service runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) workplace, earning a grade A.

Stumpy s Tree Service: 1.6 TCR = 34% of Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stumpy s Tree Service safety composite

Stumpy s Tree Service scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.2

2019→2024

Stumpy s Tree Service injury rate improved

Stumpy s Tree Service's TCR fell 6.2 from 6.2 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Ashland, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/58
  • PHOTO 1004135211
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1004135211 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Stumpy s Tree Service in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stumpy s Tree Service averages 1.6 TCR (34% of the Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stumpy s Tree Service TCR series: 2019=6.2 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Stumpy s Tree Service falls in its industry

2,875 Tree services (e.g., bracing, establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 58 Tree services (e.g., bracing, employers in Massachusetts.

Stumpy s Tree Service (31 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Stumpy s Tree Service
Stumpy s Tree Service (31 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Stumpy s Tree Service has fewer employees than the Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.2 3.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · MA · Ashland

2,875 Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 21 employers in Ashland, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1004135211 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chantilly 37060 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC - 442 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ruppert Landscape - Delaware 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE MILLBURY LEARNING CENTER-MA22 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE One Tech Circle 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raffles Unit 28C 40 Trinity Place 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Biotech Builders Group 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #46 321 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kidde-Fenwal, Inc 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR USA-MA-Kidde Fenwal-Ashland Factory 251 FTE
CITY-NEAR Terumo Cardiovascular Group 181 FTE
NAT-TCR RCI General Engineering, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Functional Devices, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodgame Company, Inc 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jones-Schlater Flooring, LLC 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE HLH Enterprises LLC 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE County Probation 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fond du Lac Express Inc. 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.