Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Minnesota

Styer Transportation Co.

Lakeville, MN · ~48 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Styer Transportation Co. runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade A.

Styer Transportation Co.: 1.4 TCR = 31% of Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Styer Transportation Co. safety composite

Styer Transportation Co. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2017→2024

Styer Transportation Co. injury rate improved

Styer Transportation Co.'s TCR fell 3.2 from 3.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.2 · 2018=4.8 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Lakeville, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/74
  • PHOTO Streator- Dry Bulk T…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Streator- Dry Bulk Transport (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Styer Transportation Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Styer Transportation Co. averages 1.4 TCR (31% of the Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Styer Transportation Co. TCR series: 2017=3.2 · 2018=4.8 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Styer Transportation Co. falls in its industry

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 74 Motor freight carrier, general employers in Minnesota.

Styer Transportation Co. (48 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Styer Transportation Co.
Styer Transportation Co. (48 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Styer Transportation Co. has fewer employees than the Motor freight carrier, general, long-dis median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2018 4.8 4.8 3 0 0
2017 3.2 3.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · MN · Lakeville

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 141 employers in Lakeville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Streator- Dry Bulk Transport 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR WM 6848 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FPK CST 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lawrenceville NOR 2 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waukon 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Swenoda 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Region Cooperative - SE Agronomy East/BCA/Shop 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2101-Redwood Falls, MN 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeville Technical Center 645 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schmitty & Sons 640 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hearthside Foods Solutions 634 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1484 - Lakeville 414 FTE
NAT-TCR REG Mason City, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ocotillo Service Center 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bushnell Feed Mill 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Possum Pt Pw St 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oaks at Eagles Landing 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE deSter 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Terminix Services Inc 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE USB Tennessee, LLC 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.