Life sciences research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) · New Jersey

SubCom, LLC

Eatontown, NJ · ~409 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SubCom, LLC runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Life sciences research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) workplace, earning a grade A.

SubCom, LLC: 0.1 TCR = 20% of Life sciences research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS 0.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SubCom, LLC safety composite

SubCom, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

SubCom, LLC held a steady TCR band

SubCom, LLC's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.2 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.2 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Eatontown, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/16
  • PHOTO BAE Systems
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~409 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BAE Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

SubCom, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SubCom, LLC averages 0.1 TCR (20% of the Life sciences research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SubCom, LLC TCR series: 2018=0.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.2 · 2023=0 · BLS 0.5

Where SubCom, LLC falls in its industry

319 Life sciences research and dev establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 16 Life sciences research and dev employers in New Jersey.

SubCom, LLC (409 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate SubCom, LLC
SubCom, LLC (409 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

SubCom, LLC has more employees than the Life sciences research and development l median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.2 0.0 0 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.2 0.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · NJ · Eatontown

319 Life sciences research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 53 employers in Eatontown, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BAE Systems 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bard Access Systems 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCG Health 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roybal Campus 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE NJLAK - LAKEWOOD 409 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edison Properties, LLC. - HQ 409 FTE
STATE-SIZE NJLDH - LYNDHURST 410 FTE
STATE-SIZE 800 Rahway Ave - Bldg D 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR HMH Hospitals Corporation 2,235 FTE
CITY-NEAR West-Ward Eatontown 342 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monmouth 052 241 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medtronic Eatontown 189 FTE
NAT-TCR Administration 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Meadowview Physician Practice LLC 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dryden 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockwell Collins Simulation & Training Solutions LLC (Sterling VA) 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Omaha NE (11 Cag Dr) 409 FTE
NAT-SIZE USM Store #561 (Market Street) 409 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arapaho Motors, Inc dba Ralph Schomp 409 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Luke's Wood River Medical Center 409 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.