Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe · Texas

Subsea Technologies Division - Spring

Spring, TX · ~29 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Subsea Technologies Division - Spring runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe workplace, earning a grade A.

Subsea Technologies Division - Spring: 1.0 TCR = 31% of Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Subsea Technologies Division - Spring safety composite

Subsea Technologies Division - Spring scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Subsea Technologies Division - Spring: 0.0 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Subsea Technologies Division - Spring's TCR rose 4.1 from 0.0 in 2019 to 4.1 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332996 · Spring, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/73
  • PHOTO Delta Machine & Iron…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Delta Machine & Ironworks (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Subsea Technologies Division - Spring in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Subsea Technologies Division - Spring averages 1.0 TCR (31% of the Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Subsea Technologies Division - Spring TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Subsea Technologies Division - Spring falls in its industry

337 Pipe fabricating (i.e., bendin establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 73 Pipe fabricating (i.e., bendin employers in Texas.

Subsea Technologies Division - Spring (29 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Subsea Technologies Division - Spring
Subsea Technologies Division - Spring (29 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Subsea Technologies Division - Spring has fewer employees than the Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332996 · TX · Spring

337 Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 212 employers in Spring, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Delta Machine & Ironworks 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chart Industries 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DMI Contractors 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR C&B Piping (East), Inc. 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Hereford 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pepper Dairy 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE SROOC Holding LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Logging, LLC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus 5,480 FTE
CITY-NEAR HP Inc. Houston 2,348 FTE
CITY-NEAR ExxonMobil Global Services Company Houston Campus 2,050 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Bureau of Shipping 1,159 FTE
NAT-TCR Amason & Associates, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Security America, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Jackson Pharmacy Professionals, LLC. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR SOMA Hotel 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Agricultural Distributing, Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tropical Nut & Fruit Company Orlando 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buttonwillow 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Owens Lumber Company, Inc 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.