Bacon, slab and sliced, made from purchased carcasses · Indiana

Sugar Creek Packing Co. CCI

Cambridge City, IN · ~492 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sugar Creek Packing Co. CCI runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bacon, slab and sliced, made from purchased carcasses workplace, earning a grade C.

Sugar Creek Packing Co. CCI: 3.2 TCR = 96% of Bacon, slab and sliced, made from purchased carcasses BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sugar Creek Packing Co. CCI safety composite

Sugar Creek Packing Co. CCI scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2023

Sugar Creek Packing Co. CCI injury rate improved

Sugar Creek Packing Co. CCI's TCR fell 3.1 from 6.9 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.9 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311612 · Cambridge City, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 96% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #7/11
  • PHOTO Frontenac, KS
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 127 inj
  • SIZE ~492 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Frontenac, KS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Sugar Creek Packing Co. CCI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sugar Creek Packing Co. CCI averages 3.2 TCR (96% of the Bacon, slab and sliced, made from purchased carcasses BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sugar Creek Packing Co. CCI TCR series: 2016=6.9 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Sugar Creek Packing Co. CCI falls in its industry

613 Bacon, slab and sliced, made f establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 11 Bacon, slab and sliced, made f employers in Indiana.

Sugar Creek Packing Co. CCI (492 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sugar Creek Packing Co. CCI
Sugar Creek Packing Co. CCI (492 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Sugar Creek Packing Co. CCI has more employees than the Bacon, slab and sliced, made from purcha median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.9 3.7 26 0 0
2022 2.4 2.1 17 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 12 0 0
2020 2.8 2.2 15 0 0
2019 2.8 1.7 16 2 0
2018 2.9 1.9 15 0 0
2017 1.8 0.8 7 0 0
2016 6.9 4.7 19 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311612 · IN · Cambridge City

613 Bacon, slab and sliced, made from purchased carcasses employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 10 employers in Cambridge City, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Frontenac, KS 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wabash Seafood 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbus Craft Meats - San Antonio 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CCK t/a Juniata Packing Company 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE King Systems Corp 492 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCSC 492 FTE
STATE-SIZE MacAllister Machinery Indianapolis Headquarters 492 FTE
STATE-SIZE Howard County Work Release 493 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dot Transportation, Inc.- IN 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dot Transportation, Inc. Cambridge City, IN 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dot Foods, Inc. Indiana 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dot Foods, Inc.- IN 118 FTE
NAT-TCR Independence Manor At Hunterdon, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Nease Harrison Plant 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryerson - Greenville 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Jet Aviation Dulles, LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arthrex Manufacturing South Carolina 492 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern Light Maine Coast Hospital 492 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clearwater Paper Shelby LLC 492 FTE
NAT-SIZE UT Medical Group DBA University Clinical Health 492 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.