Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Colorado

Sugar Valley Estates

Name: Sugar Valley Estates Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Loveland, CO · ~31 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.6
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sugar Valley Estates runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Sugar Valley Estates: 1.6 TCR = 43% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sugar Valley Estates safety composite

Sugar Valley Estates scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sugar Valley Estates held a steady TCR band

Sugar Valley Estates's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=9.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Loveland, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 43% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #3/140
PHOTO Seabury Woods
BOOK 6y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Seabury Woods (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.6
Seabury Woods

1.6
10335

1.6
Brookdale Roto

1.6
Timberdale Tra

1.6

What this shows Sugar Valley Estates averages 1.6 TCR (43% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Sugar Valley Estates TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=9.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Sugar Valley Estates falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 140 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Colorado.

Sugar Valley Estates (31 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Sugar Valley Estates has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2022	0.0	0.0	0
2021	0.0	0.0	0
2020	0.0	0.0	0
2019	0.0	0.0	0
2018	9.9	5.0	2
2017	0.0	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CO · Loveland

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 188 employers in Loveland, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Seabury Woods	ROCHESTER, NY	1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	10335	TINTON FALLS, NJ	1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Brookdale Rotonda	ROTONDA WEST, FL	1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Timberdale Trace Assisted Living	OWATONNA, MN	1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Strad USA Inc.	GREELEY	31 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Heorot Power Management, LLC	BRUSH	31 FTE
STATE-SIZE	San Isabel Electric Association-Pueblo West E&O	PUEBLO WEST	31 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Brighton Service Center-275	BRIGHTON	31 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Medical Center of the Rockies	Loveland	1,357 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Hach Company	Loveland	1,291 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Hach Loveland	Loveland	1,281 FTE
CITY-NEAR	6019	Loveland	937 FTE
NAT-TCR	Venator Augusta	Augusta, GA	1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Social Vocational Services #144	Salinas, CA	1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Tecan Systems	San Jose, CA	1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Sacramento West	West Sacramento, CA	1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Sterling Court	Deltona, FL	31 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Evolved Lighting Solutions	Columbus, OH	31 FTE
NAT-SIZE	TMS Jackson MS	Jackson, MS	31 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Hc Nationwide LLC	Cleveland, OH	31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.