Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication · Colorado

CMC Rebar Brighton

Brighton, CO · ~31 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMC Rebar Brighton runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication workplace, earning a grade A.

CMC Rebar Brighton: 0.9 TCR = 28% of Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMC Rebar Brighton safety composite

CMC Rebar Brighton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2024

CMC Rebar Brighton injury rate improved

CMC Rebar Brighton's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Brighton, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/37
  • PHOTO Construction Resourc…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Construction Resources Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

CMC Rebar Brighton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMC Rebar Brighton averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMC Rebar Brighton TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where CMC Rebar Brighton falls in its industry

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 37 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba employers in Colorado.

CMC Rebar Brighton (31 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CMC Rebar Brighton
CMC Rebar Brighton (31 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

CMC Rebar Brighton has fewer employees than the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assembl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.4 2.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · CO · Brighton

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 91 employers in Brighton, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Construction Resources Group 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The STI group Fab, Bmt 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frazier Industrial Company 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mitsubishi Chemical America- ALPOLIC Division 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Strad USA Inc. 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heorot Power Management, LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Isabel Electric Association-Pueblo West E&O 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brighton Service Center-275 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Platte Valley Medical Center 730 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4567 382 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4567 379 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vestas Nacelles 355 FTE
NAT-TCR CMC Impact Metals Pell City 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Starcon @ Marathon Canton 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Vcf 826 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Vcf 093 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Forks Distribution Center 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE MLD Technologies, LLC 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gasparini Landscaping Company Inc 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eagle Valley Inc. 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.