Skilled nursing facilities · California

Summerfield Healthcare Center

Santa Rosa, CA · ~110 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Summerfield Healthcare Center runs at 181% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Summerfield Healthcare Center: 11.8 TCR = 181% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Summerfield Healthcare Center safety composite

Summerfield Healthcare Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2017→2024

Summerfield Healthcare Center injury rate improved

Summerfield Healthcare Center's TCR fell 4.3 from 5.3 in 2017 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 39.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.3 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=39.0 · 2021=26.0 · 2022=3.3 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Santa Rosa, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 11.8 · 181% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #561/739
  • PHOTO Royal Oaks
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~110 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Royal Oaks (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Summerfield Healthcare Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Summerfield Healthcare Center averages 11.8 TCR (181% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Summerfield Healthcare Center TCR series: 2017=5.3 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=39 · 2021=26 · 2022=3.3 · 2024=1 · BLS 6.5

Where Summerfield Healthcare Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #561 safest of 739 Skilled nursing facilities employers in California.

Summerfield Healthcare Center (110 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Summerfield Healthcare Center
Summerfield Healthcare Center (110 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Summerfield Healthcare Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2022 3.3 3.3 3 0 0
2021 26.0 26.0 2 0 0
2020 39.0 39.0 3 0 0
2019 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2018 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2017 5.3 5.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Santa Rosa

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 344 employers in Santa Rosa, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Royal Oaks 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Way Nursing & Rehabilitation 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3178_6148 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Gardens Court 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Queen Victoria Farms, LP 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Ridge Farms 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE GH Dairy - California 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Braga Ranch, Inc. Soledad 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 543 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121251 2,209 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-00001480 1,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA720 SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL HR 1,806 FTE
NAT-TCR Waterstone on Augusta 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverview 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Way Nursing & Rehabilitation 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlantic Capes Fisheries Inc 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Castle Rock Construction Company of Colorado LLC 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marshalltown, Ia 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Topura America Fastener 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boston Centerless 110 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.