Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

Waterstone on Augusta

Greenville, SC · ~67 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Waterstone on Augusta runs at 309% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Waterstone on Augusta: 11.8 TCR = 309% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Waterstone on Augusta safety composite

Waterstone on Augusta scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Waterstone on Augusta: 8.1 → 13.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 33.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.89× in 2024

Waterstone on Augusta's TCR rose 5.8 from 8.1 in 2018 to 13.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 33.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Greenville, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 309% of ind

  • DART 10.5 DART
  • RANK #84/107
  • PHOTO Heritage Woods of Ce…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heritage Woods of Centralia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Waterstone on Augusta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Waterstone on Augusta averages 11.8 TCR (309% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Waterstone on Augusta TCR series: 2018=8.1 · 2020=33.9 · 2021=2 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=13.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Waterstone on Augusta falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #84 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

Waterstone on Augusta (67 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Waterstone on Augusta
Waterstone on Augusta (67 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Waterstone on Augusta has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.9 10.5 6 2 0
2023 8.7 5.2 5 0 0
2022 3.9 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2020 33.9 33.9 0 20 0
2018 8.1 4.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Greenville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heritage Woods of Centralia 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summit of Winter Garden 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakeview Commons 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Discovery Village at Stuart 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Duncan Operations Center 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oconee 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia Gas Crew Quarters 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooper River Partners, LLC 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Riverview 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Summerfield Healthcare Center 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ag Star Harvesting Inc 1 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilac - La Crosse 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Beltrami County - County Administration Building 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Products Unlimited, Inc. 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vergent Products 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oklahoma City,OK - 402P 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.