Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · California

WellQuest Palo Alto Commons

Palo Alto, CA · ~176 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
29.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

WellQuest Palo Alto Commons runs at 768% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

WellQuest Palo Alto Commons: 29.2 TCR = 768% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

WellQuest Palo Alto Commons safety composite

WellQuest Palo Alto Commons scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 29.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−34.1

2020→2023

WellQuest Palo Alto Commons injury rate improved

WellQuest Palo Alto Commons's TCR fell 34.1 from 46.2 in 2020 to 12.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 76.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=46.2 · 2021=50.5 · 2022=76.0 · 2023=12.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Palo Alto, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 29.2 · 768% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #216/216
  • PHOTO Castle Peak Senior C…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 82 inj
  • SIZE ~176 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Castle Peak Senior Care (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

WellQuest Palo Alto Commons in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows WellQuest Palo Alto Commons averages 29.2 TCR (768% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

WellQuest Palo Alto Commons TCR series: 2020=46.2 · 2021=50.5 · 2022=76 · 2023=12.2 · BLS 3.8

Where WellQuest Palo Alto Commons falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #216 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

WellQuest Palo Alto Commons (176 employees, TCR 29.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate WellQuest Palo Alto Commons
WellQuest Palo Alto Commons (176 employees, TCR 29.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

WellQuest Palo Alto Commons has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 12.2 5.2 19 2 0
2022 76.0 73.9 25 82 0
2021 50.5 45.1 27 48 0
2020 46.2 39.6 11 24 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Palo Alto

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 116 employers in Palo Alto, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Castle Peak Senior Care 29.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hoffman Senior Living 29.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Friendship Village Retirement Community 28.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evergreen Memory Care 28.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mt. View Ag 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-South Bay S/C 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE LADWP 2311 FAIRFAX 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Matt Construction Corporation 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stanford Health Care 16,371 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Palo Alto-Deer Creek-Office 1,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Varian, Palo Alto 1,396 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-10110) 1,227 FTE
NAT-TCR Christa McAuliffe Elementary 29.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Summit Delivery Systems 29.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Care Center 29.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cottage Grove Commons 29.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vestal Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hammond's Candies Since 1920, II LLC 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Antonio Military Medical Center 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Health Services for Children with Special Needs 176 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.