Aerosol valves manufacturing · New Hampshire

Summit Packaging Systems

Manchester, NH · ~478 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Summit Packaging Systems runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aerosol valves manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Summit Packaging Systems: 3.5 TCR = 105% of Aerosol valves manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Summit Packaging Systems safety composite

Summit Packaging Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2016→2024

Summit Packaging Systems injury rate improved

Summit Packaging Systems's TCR fell 2.9 from 4.8 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.8 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332919 · Manchester, NH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 105% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Dixon Sanitary
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 146 inj
  • SIZE ~478 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dixon Sanitary (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Summit Packaging Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Summit Packaging Systems averages 3.5 TCR (105% of the Aerosol valves manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Summit Packaging Systems TCR series: 2016=4.8 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=3 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Summit Packaging Systems falls in its industry

100 Aerosol valves manufacturing establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Aerosol valves manufacturing employers in New Hampshire.

Summit Packaging Systems (478 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Summit Packaging Systems
Summit Packaging Systems (478 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Summit Packaging Systems has more employees than the Aerosol valves manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.8 8 0 0
2023 1.7 1.7 7 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 6 0 0
2021 2.8 2.8 10 0 0
2020 3.0 2.8 13 0 0
2019 6.8 5.4 29 0 0
2018 5.6 3.8 28 0 0
2017 4.7 2.1 20 0 0
2016 4.8 3.2 25 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332919 · NH · Manchester

100 Aerosol valves manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 253 employers in Manchester, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dixon Sanitary 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CFWI01-CF-CF - BELOIT 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kochek CO LLC 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conbraco Industries - ByPass 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 325522-NASHUA NH P&DC 473 FTE
STATE-SIZE Contitech Thermopol LLC 484 FTE
STATE-SIZE NHBB, Inc. Astro Division 472 FTE
STATE-SIZE 21 Great Hollow 470 FTE
CITY-NEAR Point32Health Manchester 4,440 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elliot Hospital 2,745 FTE
CITY-NEAR Catholic Medical Center 2,086 FTE
CITY-NEAR 15966 1,154 FTE
NAT-TCR Avante Group 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR United Salt Baytown, LLC. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR NYSEG Liberty 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ciocca Subaru of Pleasantville 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sanders Lead Company, Inc. 478 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orgill Sikeston Distribution Center 478 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kite Pharma TCF05 Manufacturing Facility 478 FTE
NAT-SIZE Insulations, LLC. Houston 478 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.