Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Iowa

SunnyBrook of Muscatine

Muscatine, IA · ~63 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SunnyBrook of Muscatine runs at 588% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

SunnyBrook of Muscatine: 22.4 TCR = 588% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SunnyBrook of Muscatine safety composite

SunnyBrook of Muscatine scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

SunnyBrook of Muscatine: 34.2 → 41.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 41.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2020

SunnyBrook of Muscatine's TCR rose 7.6 from 34.2 in 2016 to 41.9 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Muscatine, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 22.4 · 588% of ind

  • DART 15.0 DART
  • RANK #69/70
  • PHOTO Regency Village at P…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Regency Village at Prineville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

SunnyBrook of Muscatine in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SunnyBrook of Muscatine averages 22.4 TCR (588% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SunnyBrook of Muscatine TCR series: 2016=34.2 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=8.9 · 2019=19.9 · 2020=41.9 · BLS 3.8

Where SunnyBrook of Muscatine falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 70 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Iowa.

SunnyBrook of Muscatine (63 employees, TCR 22.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate SunnyBrook of Muscatine
SunnyBrook of Muscatine (63 employees, TCR 22.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

SunnyBrook of Muscatine has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 41.9 15.0 5 9 0
2019 19.9 5.7 7 0 0
2018 8.9 4.4 4 0 0
2017 6.9 0.0 2 0 0
2016 34.2 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IA · Muscatine

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 79 employers in Muscatine, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Regency Village at Prineville 22.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Assisted Living of Twin Falls 22.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-60071 22.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fleming Point 22.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cherokee-US-Production 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Iowa Lakes Electric Cooperative 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Iowa, LLC 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keen Project Solutions 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Highway 61 982 FTE
CITY-NEAR HON Company Administration 522 FTE
CITY-NEAR SSAB Iowa Inc. 469 FTE
CITY-NEAR SSAB Iowa (SSAB North America) 466 FTE
NAT-TCR Val 53 22.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0240 Los Angeles 22.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Feld Entertainment - MUL 22.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Regency Village at Prineville 22.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE PT - Open 03/19/12 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE LV 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cl-3 Opened 10/22/13 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shrink Packaging Systems 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.