Airport passenger screening security services · South Carolina

Superior Aircraft Services - Myrtle Beach

Myrtle Beach, SC · ~59 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Superior Aircraft Services - Myrtle Beach runs at 202% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Airport passenger screening security services workplace, earning a grade F.

Superior Aircraft Services - Myrtle Beach: 9.1 TCR = 202% of Airport passenger screening security services BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Superior Aircraft Services - Myrtle Beach safety composite

Superior Aircraft Services - Myrtle Beach scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 28% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Superior Aircraft Services - Myrtle Beach held a steady TCR band

Superior Aircraft Services - Myrtle Beach's TCR held near 0.2 from 9.0 in 2023 to 9.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=9.0 · 2024=9.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Myrtle Beach, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 202% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #7/8
  • PHOTO Signature Flight Sup…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Signature Flight Support ATL335 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Superior Aircraft Services - Myrtle Beach in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Superior Aircraft Services - Myrtle Beach averages 9.1 TCR (202% of the Airport passenger screening security services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Superior Aircraft Services - Myrtle Beach TCR series: 2023=9 · 2024=9.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Superior Aircraft Services - Myrtle Beach falls in its industry

992 Airport passenger screening se establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 Airport passenger screening se employers in South Carolina.

Superior Aircraft Services - Myrtle Beach (59 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Superior Aircraft Services - Myrtle Beach
Superior Aircraft Services - Myrtle Beach (59 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Superior Aircraft Services - Myrtle Beach has fewer employees than the Airport passenger screening security ser median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.2 3.1 3 0 1
2023 9.0 9.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · SC · Myrtle Beach

992 Airport passenger screening security services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 244 employers in Myrtle Beach, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Signature Flight Support ATL335 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR OAK OAKLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BOS 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Aerospace Coating 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Orangeburg 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charleston Office 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mundy Maintenance, Services and Operations LLC Job #32378 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA Wool, Inc. 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA - Grand Strand Medical Center 1,584 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Strand Health 1,257 FTE
CITY-NEAR Founders National Golf, LLC 829 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocean Lakes Service Corp. 440 FTE
NAT-TCR GAM Enterprises 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Saver Group,Inc dba Irvine Save-A-Lot 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Metal Forms Corporation 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR DSW 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE RP National 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rags Brooms and Mops Inc 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE owensboro surgery center 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Range Mental Health Center - Bell 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.