Distribution Center for Grocery Stores · California

Superior Grocers DC

Santa Fe Springs, CA · ~143 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Superior Grocers DC runs at 279% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution Center for Grocery Stores workplace, earning a grade F.

Superior Grocers DC: 9.5 TCR = 279% of Distribution Center for Grocery Stores BLS 3.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Superior Grocers DC safety composite

Superior Grocers DC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 28% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.7

2017→2024

Superior Grocers DC injury rate improved

Superior Grocers DC's TCR fell 9.7 from 15.7 in 2017 to 6.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.7 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=11.9 · 2020=15.3 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=6.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Santa Fe Springs, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 279% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #3288/4686
  • PHOTO Raley's 341-Windsor
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 80 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Raley's 341-Windsor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Superior Grocers DC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Superior Grocers DC averages 9.5 TCR (279% of the Distribution Center for Grocery Stores BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Superior Grocers DC TCR series: 2017=15.7 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=11.9 · 2020=15.3 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=6 · BLS 3.4

Where Superior Grocers DC falls in its industry

30,654 Distribution Center for Grocer establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3288 safest of 4686 Distribution Center for Grocer employers in California.

Superior Grocers DC (143 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Superior Grocers DC
Superior Grocers DC (143 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Superior Grocers DC has more employees than the Distribution Center for Grocery Stores median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 4.9 10 1 0
2023 4.9 4.3 8 0 0
2022 4.6 3.7 5 0 0
2020 15.3 7.2 16 1 1
2019 11.9 8.2 16 0 0
2018 7.8 6.1 7 2 0
2017 15.7 13.9 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · CA · Santa Fe Springs

30,654 Distribution Center for Grocery Stores employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 310 employers in Santa Fe Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Raley's 341-Windsor 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10718 Trinity 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6400-SWY-0027-0027-01818 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-02908 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE John Kautz Farms 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Deseret Farms of California 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southland Sod Farms Operations, Inc. 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Woodland WDL1 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 423 3,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI 1,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vans Distribution Center - SFS 757 FTE
NAT-TCR C033 Zanesville 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Main 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Elm City Rehabilitation Center, Inc. 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Breakthru Beverage South Carolina - Hilton Head 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hilton Alexandria Mark Center 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Redner's Warehouse Market Bel Air 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0611 Hoboken 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pocatello 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.