Industrial Wholesale Distribution · Minnesota

Supply Technologies- Minneapolis

Minneapolis, MN · ~83 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Supply Technologies- Minneapolis runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Industrial Wholesale Distribution workplace, earning a grade B.

Supply Technologies- Minneapolis: 1.5 TCR = 68% of Industrial Wholesale Distribution BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Supply Technologies- Minneapolis safety composite

Supply Technologies- Minneapolis scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.3

2017→2024

Supply Technologies- Minneapolis injury rate improved

Supply Technologies- Minneapolis's TCR fell 8.3 from 8.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423840 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/33
  • PHOTO Supply Technologies-…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Supply Technologies- Dayton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Supply Technologies- Minneapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Supply Technologies- Minneapolis averages 1.5 TCR (68% of the Industrial Wholesale Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Supply Technologies- Minneapolis TCR series: 2017=8.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Supply Technologies- Minneapolis falls in its industry

589 Industrial Wholesale Distribut establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 33 Industrial Wholesale Distribut employers in Minnesota.

Supply Technologies- Minneapolis (83 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Supply Technologies- Minneapolis
Supply Technologies- Minneapolis (83 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Supply Technologies- Minneapolis has more employees than the Industrial Wholesale Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.5 2.5 1 1 0
2020 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 8.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423840 · MN · Minneapolis

589 Industrial Wholesale Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Supply Technologies- Dayton 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR WISCH 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mirka USA Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MNST1 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE King Gen Plant-PD 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE MVEC 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hy-Tec Construction of Brainerd, Inc. 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE J&D Construction, Inc. 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Supply Technologies- Dayton 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR South Bend 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Vista Wholesale Nursery, Incorporated 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Heimbrock, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Metaltech Products Inc. 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willows at Fritz Farm 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Davis Stuart, Inc 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE RC Furniture 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.