Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) · California

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30435)

Fairfield, CA · ~148 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30435) runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) workplace, earning a grade B.

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30435): 3.0 TCR = 79% of Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30435) safety composite

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30435) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2022→2023

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30435) injury rate improved

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30435)'s TCR fell 1.2 from 3.6 in 2022 to 2.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.6 · 2023=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Fairfield, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 79% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #119/387
  • PHOTO Billings Clinic Down…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~148 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Billings Clinic Downtown Campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30435) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30435) averages 3.0 TCR (79% of the Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30435) TCR series: 2022=3.6 · 2023=2.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30435) falls in its industry

2,836 Offices of Physicians (except establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #119 safest of 387 Offices of Physicians (except employers in California.

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30435) (148 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30435)
Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30435) (148 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30435) has more employees than the Offices of Physicians (except Mental Hea median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2022 3.6 1.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · CA · Fairfield

2,836 Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 172 employers in Fairfield, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Billings Clinic Downtown Campus 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7 Vermont Drive 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Overland Park (RSO) 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 945 Summer St 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE OSF San Francisco Office 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE VAN NUYS DISTR HDQ 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE LADWP 18718 RAYEN 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE C A Rasmussen, Inc. 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 108 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR NorthBay Healthcare Medical Center 1,086 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jelly Belly Candy Company 511 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Propulsion Company (Fairfield CA) 460 FTE
NAT-TCR Greenwich Ct Plant 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Yuma County Development Services 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Face to Face Health & Counseling - Clinic 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Strata Corporation 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4223-M0200 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mitchell County Hospital 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Horizon Home Health and Hospice 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tampa Pavement Construction 148 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.