Community recreation programs, government · California

Parks & Recreation

Fairfield, CA · ~148 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
23.9
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Parks & Recreation runs at 746% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Community recreation programs, government workplace, earning a grade F.

Parks & Recreation: 23.9 TCR = 746% of Community recreation programs, government BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Parks & Recreation safety composite

Parks & Recreation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 23.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Parks & Recreation: 12.3 → 45.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 48.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.48× in 2024

Parks & Recreation's TCR rose 33.5 from 12.3 in 2019 to 45.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 48.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Fairfield, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 23.9 · 746% of ind

  • DART 11.4 DART
  • RANK #93/96
  • PHOTO City of New Haven Pa…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~148 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Parks & Recreation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Parks & Recreation averages 23.9 TCR (746% of the Community recreation programs, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Parks & Recreation TCR series: 2019=12.3 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=48.6 · 2023=23.5 · 2024=45.8 · BLS 3.2

Where Parks & Recreation falls in its industry

413 Community recreation programs, establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #93 safest of 96 Community recreation programs, employers in California.

Parks & Recreation (148 employees, TCR 23.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Parks & Recreation
Parks & Recreation (148 employees, TCR 23.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Parks & Recreation has more employees than the Community recreation programs, governmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 45.8 11.4 3 5 0
2023 23.5 23.5 5 0 0
2022 48.6 21.9 6 14 0
2021 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2020 7.8 2.6 3 0 0
2019 12.3 7.7 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · CA · Fairfield

413 Community recreation programs, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 172 employers in Fairfield, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road 24.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Algin Sutton RC 24.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green Meadows RC 21.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Joaquin County Department of Parks and Recreation 21.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE OSF San Francisco Office 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE VAN NUYS DISTR HDQ 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE LADWP 18718 RAYEN 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE C A Rasmussen, Inc. 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 108 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR NorthBay Healthcare Medical Center 1,086 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jelly Belly Candy Company 511 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Propulsion Company (Fairfield CA) 460 FTE
NAT-TCR Alden Orland Park 23.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Driven Logistics 23.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1868 23.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-331-Williams Sonoma 23.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Genz Ryan Plumbing and Heating Co Inc 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ardmore Bldg H 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Houston TX FXFE-NHU 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Select Specialty Hospital - The Villages, Inc 148 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.