Distribution of electric power · Florida

Suwannee Valley Electric Cooperative

Live Oak, FL · ~86 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Suwannee Valley Electric Cooperative runs at 237% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Suwannee Valley Electric Cooperative: 2.8 TCR = 237% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Suwannee Valley Electric Cooperative safety composite

Suwannee Valley Electric Cooperative scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2024

Suwannee Valley Electric Cooperative injury rate improved

Suwannee Valley Electric Cooperative's TCR fell 1.4 from 6.0 in 2016 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.0 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Live Oak, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.8 · 237% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #107/135
  • PHOTO Roseau Electric Coop…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Roseau Electric Cooperative, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Suwannee Valley Electric Cooperative in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Suwannee Valley Electric Cooperative averages 2.8 TCR (237% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Suwannee Valley Electric Cooperative TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Suwannee Valley Electric Cooperative falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #107 safest of 135 Distribution of electric power employers in Florida.

Suwannee Valley Electric Cooperative (86 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Suwannee Valley Electric Cooperative
Suwannee Valley Electric Cooperative (86 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Suwannee Valley Electric Cooperative has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 1.1 2 2 0
2023 5.1 3.8 4 0 0
2022 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2018 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2017 3.4 0.0 3 0 0
2016 6.0 1.2 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · FL · Live Oak

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 46 employers in Live Oak, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Roseau Electric Cooperative, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Verdigris Valley Electric Cooperative 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR REC - Bowling Green 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brighton 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Citrus County Combined Cycle Plant 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hines Energy Complex 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office - Orlando 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gulf Coast Electric Cooperative 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1243 CP - Live Oak, FL 1,532 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1243 - Plant - Live Oak, FL 1,473 FTE
CITY-NEAR Suwanee Music Park & Campground 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advent Christian Village 428 FTE
NAT-TCR Ventra Sandusky 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 050 - Cascade 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunrise Air Systems Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Osterwisch Company 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Mills House Wyndham Grand Hotel 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chemline Inc 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maceys Olympus 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lincoln Industries 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.