Dinners, frozen (except seafood-based), manufacturing · Georgia

Suzanna's Kitchen, Inc.

Duluth, GA · ~576 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Suzanna's Kitchen, Inc. runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Dinners, frozen (except seafood-based), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Suzanna's Kitchen, Inc.: 3.9 TCR = 119% of Dinners, frozen (except seafood-based), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Suzanna's Kitchen, Inc. safety composite

Suzanna's Kitchen, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2017→2024

Suzanna's Kitchen, Inc. injury rate improved

Suzanna's Kitchen, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.4 from 6.8 in 2017 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.8 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=3.6 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311412 · Duluth, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 119% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO Louisville KY 2
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 180 inj
  • SIZE ~576 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Louisville KY 2 (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Suzanna's Kitchen, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Suzanna's Kitchen, Inc. averages 3.9 TCR (119% of the Dinners, frozen (except seafood-based), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Suzanna's Kitchen, Inc. TCR series: 2017=6.8 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=3.6 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Suzanna's Kitchen, Inc. falls in its industry

274 Dinners, frozen (except seafoo establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 Dinners, frozen (except seafoo employers in Georgia.

Suzanna's Kitchen, Inc. (576 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 201 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Suzanna's Kitchen, Inc.
Suzanna's Kitchen, Inc. (576 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 201 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Suzanna's Kitchen, Inc. has more employees than the Dinners, frozen (except seafood-based), median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.4 9 0 0
2022 3.6 3.1 26 0 0
2021 3.2 3.2 22 0 0
2020 2.8 2.8 20 0 0
2019 4.1 4.0 28 0 0
2018 5.7 5.2 36 0 0
2017 6.8 6.3 39 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311412 · GA · Duluth

274 Dinners, frozen (except seafood-based), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 203 employers in Duluth, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Louisville KY 2 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SALINA PLANT 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kraft Heinz Frozen Foods 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colors Enterprises 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hamilton Growers, Inc. 575 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA Dalton GA IVC 575 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA Summerville GA 574 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant 52/1S/2S/20 578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside Duluth 1,352 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boehringer Ingelheim Duluth 1,327 FTE
CITY-NEAR BI Vet Medica 1,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR 123569-NORTH METRO GA P&DC 1,103 FTE
NAT-TCR The Home for the Aged 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus Doors 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Peters Construction Corporation 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Philip Simmons Middle School 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clark Regional Medical Center 576 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gulf Coast Regional Blood Center 576 FTE
NAT-SIZE Performance Energy Services, LLC 576 FTE
NAT-SIZE DRS Dallas TX 576 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.