Elementary and secondary schools · South Carolina

Philip Simmons Middle School

Wando, SC · ~55 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Philip Simmons Middle School runs at 280% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Elementary and secondary schools workplace, earning a grade F.

Philip Simmons Middle School: 3.9 TCR = 280% of Elementary and secondary schools BLS 1.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Philip Simmons Middle School safety composite

Philip Simmons Middle School scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2019→2024

Philip Simmons Middle School injury rate improved

Philip Simmons Middle School's TCR fell 3.5 from 6.0 in 2019 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=12.2 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611110 · Wando, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.9 · 280% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #69/129
  • PHOTO Phoebus High School
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Phoebus High School (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Philip Simmons Middle School in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Philip Simmons Middle School averages 3.9 TCR (280% of the Elementary and secondary schools BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Philip Simmons Middle School TCR series: 2019=6 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=12.2 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 1.4

Where Philip Simmons Middle School falls in its industry

3,374 Elementary and secondary schoo establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 129 Elementary and secondary schoo employers in South Carolina.

Philip Simmons Middle School (55 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Philip Simmons Middle School
Philip Simmons Middle School (55 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Philip Simmons Middle School has fewer employees than the Elementary and secondary schools median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2023 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 12.2 12.2 4 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.0 6.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611110 · SC · Wando

3,374 Elementary and secondary schools employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 8 employers in Wando, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Phoebus High School 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lindsay Middle School 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ISD 492 Austin Southgate Elementary 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR EARLY LEARNING CENTER 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE JRD Growers 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Startex-Jackson-Wellford-Duncan Water District 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE JMCOPEINC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Axiom Foundations 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR BP Cooper River Plant 208 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper River Plant 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR INEOS US Chemicals Company, Cooper River Plant 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cape Romain Contractors 96 FTE
NAT-TCR Ray Smith & Associates, Inc. 78 White Street 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Peters Construction Corporation 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR BR17 Redding 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Suzanna's Kitchen, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE AMP Companies, Inc. 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Belleville 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE TCSO CS Visalia Courthouse 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockport Township High School District 205 Transportation Center 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.