Nursing homes · Tennessee

The Waters of Johnson City

Johnson City, TN · ~79 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Waters of Johnson City runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade D.

The Waters of Johnson City: 9.0 TCR = 138% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Waters of Johnson City safety composite

The Waters of Johnson City scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.7

2016→2024

The Waters of Johnson City injury rate improved

The Waters of Johnson City's TCR fell 7.7 from 19.4 in 2016 to 11.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 66.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=19.4 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=7.7 · 2020=12.3 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=66.7 · 2024=11.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Johnson City, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.0 · 138% of ind

  • DART 6.7 DART
  • RANK #208/278
  • PHOTO HIGHLAND SPRINGS CAR…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HIGHLAND SPRINGS CARE CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

The Waters of Johnson City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Waters of Johnson City averages 9.0 TCR (138% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Waters of Johnson City TCR series: 2016=19.4 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=7.7 · 2020=12.3 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=66.7 · 2024=11.7 · BLS 6.5

Where The Waters of Johnson City falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #208 safest of 278 Nursing homes employers in Tennessee.

The Waters of Johnson City (79 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Waters of Johnson City
The Waters of Johnson City (79 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Waters of Johnson City has fewer employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.7 6.7 7 0 0
2023 66.7 66.7 1 0 0
2022 0.1 0.0 3 0 0
2021 7.2 7.2 4 0 0
2020 12.3 8.8 7 0 0
2019 7.7 3.8 4 0 0
2018 7.3 5.8 5 0 0
2017 6.2 4.6 4 0 0
2016 19.4 9.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TN · Johnson City

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 177 employers in Johnson City, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HIGHLAND SPRINGS CARE CENTER 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor Care Centers - Valhaven 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 751 RIVERRIDGE OUTPATIENT - ME 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bluestone Health and Rehabilitation 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE GP Cleanout (Loretto) 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Middle Tennessee Electric Membership Corporation (Franklin) 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walker General Contractors 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blaine Construction Corporation Corporate 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR East Tennessee State University 4,802 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson City Medical Center 2,099 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ballad Health 1,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mountain States Health Alliance 1,033 FTE
NAT-TCR RAM Tool Inc Grafton 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Decatur - 02 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Palm Beach 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Arc Broward - Main Campus 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southwick & Meister Inc. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carl Buddig & Company-215-45th Street 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCP 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Behr Paint Company Roanoke MFG 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.