General Warehousing and Storage · Washington

Swy-0027-0027-06608 Fac-06608-Auburn-Wa

Auburn, WA · ~782 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Swy-0027-0027-06608 Fac-06608-Auburn-Wa runs at 322% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade F.

Swy-0027-0027-06608 Fac-06608-Auburn-Wa: 18.7 TCR = 322% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Swy-0027-0027-06608 Fac-06608-Auburn-Wa safety composite

Swy-0027-0027-06608 Fac-06608-Auburn-Wa scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2023→2024

Swy-0027-0027-06608 Fac-06608-Auburn-Wa injury rate improved

Swy-0027-0027-06608 Fac-06608-Auburn-Wa's TCR fell 6.4 from 21.9 in 2023 to 15.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 21.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=21.9 · 2024=15.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Auburn, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 18.7 · 322% of ind

  • DART 14.8 DART
  • RANK #149/154
  • PHOTO Oakland Distribution…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 223 inj
  • SIZE ~782 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oakland Distribution Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Swy-0027-0027-06608 Fac-06608-Auburn-Wa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Swy-0027-0027-06608 Fac-06608-Auburn-Wa averages 18.7 TCR (322% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Swy-0027-0027-06608 Fac-06608-Auburn-Wa TCR series: 2023=21.9 · 2024=15.4 · BLS 5.8

Where Swy-0027-0027-06608 Fac-06608-Auburn-Wa falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #149 safest of 154 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Washington.

Swy-0027-0027-06608 Fac-06608-Auburn-Wa (782 employees, TCR 18.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Swy-0027-0027-06608 Fac-06608-Auburn-Wa
Swy-0027-0027-06608 Fac-06608-Auburn-Wa (782 employees, TCR 18.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Swy-0027-0027-06608 Fac-06608-Auburn-Wa has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.4 14.8 95 16 0
2023 21.9 19.6 128 30 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · WA · Auburn

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 166 employers in Auburn, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oakland Distribution Center 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mochila Fulfillment NJ01 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Center Valley Ofc/Whse 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greenwood Ofc/Whse 18.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE King County Wastewater Treatment 783 FTE
STATE-SIZE King County Executive Services 784 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2252-00000215 779 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chelan County PUD (Overall Organization Totals) 778 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA001 4,392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zones, LLC 1,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR Muckleshoot Casino 1,616 FTE
CITY-NEAR Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR Orpen - Pendleton 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Oakland Distribution Center 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Willamette Valley Lumber 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Edina - Police Department 18.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE John Deere Kernersville 782 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loews Royal Pacific Resort 782 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paris Regional Medical Center 782 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jasper Products, LLC 782 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.