Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins · Pennsylvania

Sylvin Technologies Inc

Denver, PA · ~36 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sylvin Technologies Inc runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins workplace, earning a grade B.

Sylvin Technologies Inc: 2.3 TCR = 68% of Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sylvin Technologies Inc safety composite

Sylvin Technologies Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2016→2021

Sylvin Technologies Inc injury rate improved

Sylvin Technologies Inc's TCR fell 4.5 from 4.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.5 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325991 · Denver, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/24
  • PHOTO Teknor Apex Company …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Teknor Apex Company - Rhode Island (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Sylvin Technologies Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sylvin Technologies Inc averages 2.3 TCR (68% of the Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sylvin Technologies Inc TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Sylvin Technologies Inc falls in its industry

342 Custom compounding (i.e., blen establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 24 Custom compounding (i.e., blen employers in Pennsylvania.

Sylvin Technologies Inc (36 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sylvin Technologies Inc
Sylvin Technologies Inc (36 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Sylvin Technologies Inc has fewer employees than the Custom compounding (i.e., blending and m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 6.8 6.8 3 0 0
2016 4.5 0.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325991 · PA · Denver

342 Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 44 employers in Denver, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Teknor Apex Company - Rhode Island 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Asahi Kasei Plastics Michigan 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR TPM Dalton 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Multibase, Inc. 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE George Didden Greenhouses, Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Altoona 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Penn Natural Gas Williamsport 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE TIS - PA - Fairless Hills 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPERVALU DISTRIBUTION CENTER - LANCASTER 38311 993 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAI-0034-0034-06655 FAC-06655-DENVER-PA 964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pepperidge Farms, Denver 936 FTE
CITY-NEAR E00720-Pepperidge Farm Denver PA 912 FTE
NAT-TCR Englands Stove Works Inc NP 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Callidus Technologies LLC 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Aptargroup, Inc. - Cary South 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SJC-SPF 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Edith Wheeler Memorial Library 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Public Works Department 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ocean View Market 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pan American Body Shop - Certified 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.