Construction management, commercial and institutional building · Illinois

Synergy Construction Group

Chicago, IL · ~39 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Synergy Construction Group runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade D.

Synergy Construction Group: 5.3 TCR = 183% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Synergy Construction Group safety composite

Synergy Construction Group scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Synergy Construction Group: 0.0 → 8.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 10.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.55× in 2022

Synergy Construction Group's TCR rose 8.2 from 0.0 in 2018 to 8.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 183% of ind

  • DART 8.2 DART
  • RANK #145/169
  • PHOTO Frith Construction C…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Frith Construction Company, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Synergy Construction Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Synergy Construction Group averages 5.3 TCR (183% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Synergy Construction Group TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=10.1 · 2020=3 · 2022=8.2 · BLS 2.9

Where Synergy Construction Group falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #145 safest of 169 Construction management, comme employers in Illinois.

Synergy Construction Group (39 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Synergy Construction Group
Synergy Construction Group (39 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Synergy Construction Group has fewer employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.2 8.2 3 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2019 10.1 10.1 4 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · IL · Chicago

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Frith Construction Company, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR R. Yoder Construction, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Septagon Construction Company, Incorporated-Grimes 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR FCL Builders California, LLC 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beck's El Paso 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Glen Nursery, Inc 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRG Joliet Generating Station 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Bloomington 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR 1284 - Opelika 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR LindenGrove Communities - Waukesha - Linden Court 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sandy Lick Location - SandyLick 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR HG619 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lithia CJD of Twin Falls 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE G02 Lee Wright Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE OCL-ODFL 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Melco Construction 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.