Laser systems and equipment, medical, manufacturing · Washington

Synrad

Name: Synrad Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Mukilteo, WA · ~158 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.1
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Synrad runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Laser systems and equipment, medical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Synrad: 1.1 TCR = 35% of Laser systems and equipment, medical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Synrad safety composite

Synrad scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers
DART rate: D 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2022

Synrad injury rate improved

Synrad's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.8 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334510 · Mukilteo, WA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 35% of ind

DART 0.7 DART
RANK #11/12
PHOTO Ondal Medical System…
BOOK 6y book
INJ 11 inj
SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ondal Medical Systems of America (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.1
Ondal Medical

1.1
CN Scottsdale

1.1
HF Pleasanton

1.1
GEHC : Florenc

1.1

What this shows Synrad averages 1.1 TCR (35% of the Laser systems and equipment, medical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Synrad TCR series: 2017=1.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Synrad falls in its industry

242 Laser systems and equipment, m establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 12 Laser systems and equipment, m employers in Washington.

Synrad (158 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Synrad has fewer employees than the Laser systems and equipment, medical, ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2022	0.7	0.7	1
2021	1.3	1.3	2
2020	1.3	1.3	2
2019	1.8	1.8	3
2018	0.0	0.0	0
2017	1.8	0.6	3

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334510 · WA · Mukilteo

242 Laser systems and equipment, medical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 37 employers in Mukilteo, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Ondal Medical Systems of America	SANDSTON, VA	1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	CN Scottsdale	SCOTTSDALE, AZ	1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	HF Pleasanton CA	PLEASANTON, CA	1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	GEHC : Florence SC, HCS	FLORENCE, SC	1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Columbia Valley Fruit, LLC	UNION GAP	158 FTE
STATE-SIZE	IMCO General Construction	FERNDALE	158 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Division 1 - Seattle	SEATTLE	158 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Darigold Rainier	SEATTLE	158 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WA012	Mukilteo	1,421 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Travis Industries	Mukilteo	534 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Electroimpact Inc.	Mukilteo	383 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Systima Technologies Inc	Mukilteo	322 FTE
NAT-TCR	Denver West 40040	Sheridan, CO	1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Orlando (Moran)	Orlando, FL	1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Sodexo at Langston Facilities	Langston, OK	1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Trajen Flight Support LP - AUS	Austin, TX	1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Orange County North 32020	Anaheim, CA	158 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Myers Well service Pennsylvania Branch	Eighty Four, PA	158 FTE
NAT-SIZE	EMS - Harrisburg, PA	Mechanicsburg, PA	158 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Williamsport Refurb	Williamsport, MD	158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.