Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) · New York

Syracuse Label Co., Inc.

North Syracuse, NY · ~95 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Syracuse Label Co., Inc. runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) workplace, earning a grade B.

Syracuse Label Co., Inc.: 2.5 TCR = 74% of Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Syracuse Label Co., Inc. safety composite

Syracuse Label Co., Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Syracuse Label Co., Inc.: 0.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 6.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.96× in 2024

Syracuse Label Co., Inc.'s TCR rose 2.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · North Syracuse, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 74% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #47/106
  • PHOTO Marathon Press
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Marathon Press (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Syracuse Label Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Syracuse Label Co., Inc. averages 2.5 TCR (74% of the Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Syracuse Label Co., Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=4 · 2020=2 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=6.7 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Syracuse Label Co., Inc. falls in its industry

2,001 Print shops, flexographic (exc establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 106 Print shops, flexographic (exc employers in New York.

Syracuse Label Co., Inc. (95 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Syracuse Label Co., Inc.
Syracuse Label Co., Inc. (95 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Syracuse Label Co., Inc. has more employees than the Print shops, flexographic (except printi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2023 3.7 1.9 4 0 0
2022 6.7 4.8 6 1 0
2021 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2020 2.0 0.0 2 0 0
2019 4.0 1.0 4 0 0
2018 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · NY · North Syracuse

2,001 Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 26 employers in North Syracuse, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Marathon Press 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Global Packaging Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Digico Imaging 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR GBS PrinTech Labeling and Filing Malvern Location 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Junction Boulevard 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE 9502 Avenue D 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE STCFField 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nonnis Foods LLC 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR SRC Syracuse 721 FTE
CITY-NEAR PACE LA 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR BEACON NORTH SERVICE CENTER-NY80 281 FTE
CITY-NEAR G.A. Braun, Inc 190 FTE
NAT-TCR John Riley Construction 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR IMC Electrical LLC 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR J L Marshall & Sons, Inc 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Street Care Center 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Devon Energy - Killdeer ND 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Everett Ship Repair 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE BrandFX, LLC - Swea City 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1361 S. 3200 W. 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.