Building automation system installation contractors · North Carolina

System Logistics Corporation

Arden, NC · ~161 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

System Logistics Corporation runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Building automation system installation contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

System Logistics Corporation: 2.3 TCR = 84% of Building automation system installation contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

System Logistics Corporation safety composite

System Logistics Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2019→2024

System Logistics Corporation injury rate improved

System Logistics Corporation's TCR fell 0.7 from 3.0 in 2019 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.0 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Arden, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 84% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #61/108
  • PHOTO Cynergy Electric Com…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~161 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cynergy Electric Company, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

System Logistics Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows System Logistics Corporation averages 2.3 TCR (84% of the Building automation system installation contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

System Logistics Corporation TCR series: 2019=3 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 2.8

Where System Logistics Corporation falls in its industry

4,550 Building automation system ins establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 108 Building automation system ins employers in North Carolina.

System Logistics Corporation (161 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate System Logistics Corporation
System Logistics Corporation (161 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

System Logistics Corporation has more employees than the Building automation system installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 1.8 5 0 0
2023 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2022 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2020 6.1 6.1 7 0 0
2019 3.0 3.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · NC · Arden

4,550 Building automation system installation contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 77 employers in Arden, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cynergy Electric Company, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anderson Electric, Inc. / Bloomington Branch 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allstate Electrical Contracting, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR McPhee Electric Ltd. 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pike Telecom and Renewables Massachuttes Statewide Operations 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tennoca Construction Company 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE Warco Construction Inc 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE Welcome Tube 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASHEVILLE NC 997 FTE
CITY-NEAR DUKE-ASHEVILLE 847 FTE
CITY-NEAR BorgWarner Asheville 680 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jabil Healthcare Asheville 566 FTE
NAT-TCR F. M. Howell & Company-Folding Carton Plant 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Synergy Equipment Jacksonville 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Service PS 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SA Recycling, Bowling Green-Graham 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE O.W. Lee Co. Inc 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE RCS Grading 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE WI02 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Char-Broil, LLC 161 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.