Dry bulk carrier, truck, long-distance · California

T & T Trucking, Inc. - Lodi Terminal

Lodi, CA · ~49 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

T & T Trucking, Inc. - Lodi Terminal runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Dry bulk carrier, truck, long-distance workplace, earning a grade C.

T & T Trucking, Inc. - Lodi Terminal: 4.0 TCR = 89% of Dry bulk carrier, truck, long-distance BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

T & T Trucking, Inc. - Lodi Terminal safety composite

T & T Trucking, Inc. - Lodi Terminal scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2017→2024

T & T Trucking, Inc. - Lodi Terminal injury rate improved

T & T Trucking, Inc. - Lodi Terminal's TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.0 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=5.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484230 · Lodi, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 89% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #32/44
  • PHOTO KY - Carrollton
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KY - Carrollton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

T & T Trucking, Inc. - Lodi Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows T & T Trucking, Inc. - Lodi Terminal averages 4.0 TCR (89% of the Dry bulk carrier, truck, long-distance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

T & T Trucking, Inc. - Lodi Terminal TCR series: 2017=4 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=5 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where T & T Trucking, Inc. - Lodi Terminal falls in its industry

1,026 Dry bulk carrier, truck, long- establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 44 Dry bulk carrier, truck, long- employers in California.

T & T Trucking, Inc. - Lodi Terminal (49 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate T & T Trucking, Inc. - Lodi Terminal
T & T Trucking, Inc. - Lodi Terminal (49 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2

T & T Trucking, Inc. - Lodi Terminal has more employees than the Dry bulk carrier, truck, long-distance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.0 3.3 3 0 0
2022 5.2 5.2 3 0 0
2021 6.4 6.4 4 0 0
2020 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2019 4.3 2.9 3 0 0
2018 5.4 4.0 4 0 0
2017 4.0 4.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484230 · CA · Lodi

1,026 Dry bulk carrier, truck, long-distance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 140 employers in Lodi, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KY - Carrollton 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transport Service 60337 TSC Baytown 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moore Transport - Spring Hill 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tyler Yard 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE LAJES FARMS INC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunview Shandon 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rawah-Napa County 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Farms 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Perez Farming Services Inc. 1,145 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9292-AHLM001 - HOSPITAL 1,030 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-223 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 592 890 FTE
NAT-TCR Park Rapids Clinic 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR S03327 - Phoenix Hauling South 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Aberdeen Road Company 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR National Plastek, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Summit Concrete Construction, Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Three Rivers Boat & Barge Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oberlin 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metals USA #508 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.